Poker Forum

I think It s going to be a ultra agressive player, one of them will take control on a big pot, probably getting lucky and then will just have enough chips to finish the job.

I think the winner will be the one with the best feeling of luck. Most of these players eliminated opponents just because they were lucky, and chose the right decision how to play the last hand against them. They all know how to play poker, and they showed it. The luck will do its job, and help only one of them

Yep, I think Montgomery had his luck already going all in with A high on the flop and hitting the river... That was insane. Anyway, when you are at the final table and you started with more than 6000 player, I think the number of bad beat you gave must be ridiculous...

It is going to be very intersting I think.

I agree, and I would like to see a young and not yet a big poker pro as a winner. That would be cool.

I'd actually rather see a pro win, disproving the fact that these huge fields can only be won by amateurs

No young pro......old amateur.

Well, it seems to be granted as David is the biggest pro and he is on the circuit only for 3 years now, I think it would be great to have a poker player who will actually become a superstar, most of the winners from the last years won the main event and that s it, after that, they have bit of hype and that s all.

Ivan David and Peter could become the next big thing. I think It is important for the WSOP that the main event winner stop to be a one and done kind of guy.

Viticus wrote

i like either peter eastgate or demidov to win...ylon schwartz (my personal favorite) has a pretty good chance if he doesn't melt down (alot like me!). Craig Marquis is a pretty good player but he really cant afford one big bad beat to anyone at the table. That is an issue considering almost everyone catches one at a final table.

Just call me the "The Prophet."

Yes, you are, Viticus Good job! Now I hope Peter Eastgate will win.