PokerStars Championship Prague
888poker
New poker experience at 888poker

Join now to get $88 FREE (no deposit needed)

Join now
PokerStars
Double your first deposit up to $400

New players can use bonus code 'STARS400'

Join now
partypoker
partypoker Cashback

Get up to 40% back every week!

Join now
Unibet
€200 progressive bonus

+ a FREE Unibet Open Qualifier ticket

Join now

Opinion: Coke's Super Bowl Ad Irks Online Poker Players

Opinion: Coke's Super Bowl Ad Irks Online Poker Players 0001

Who could forget that magical Super Bowl XV commercial moment when Mean Joe Greene tosses his jersey to the kid who gives him a Coke? And what about those playful Coke-drinking polar bears that romp across our television screens every holiday season? For this year's Super Bowl, Coke apparently broke with its touching ad legacy; that is, unless you got the warm fuzzies watching left-wing political pundit James Carville cozy up to right-wing former Senator Bill Frist.

And why did Coke choose Bill Frist anyway? It's not like he's that recognizable a public figure. Since his departure from the Senate, Frist has been almost invisible. I mean, even the World Bank wouldn't take him, and I hear they'd take anyone. Even if people don't like Carville and his frequent talking-head appearances and odd physical looks (people have jokingly speculated that he was sired "during the love scene in Deliverance"), he is at least recognizable.

There was one group of people, however, that had no trouble identifying Frist in Coke's Super Bowl ad. Ever since Bill Frist snuck the UIGEA into "must pass" legislation to curry favor with Iowa Congressman Jim Leach, he's become persona non grata in the online poker community. Poker forums were buzzing on Monday morning, talking of a possible boycott of Coke products. Links to Coke's feedback page were readily available. Pictures of Pepsi ads littered threads as posters acknowledged that "things might go better with Coke," but online poker went better with Pepsi.

Even if poker players united against Coke for their allegedly shortsighted ad choice, many have speculated it would have little impact to Coke's bottom line or decision-making process. They'd never be able to organize to any appreciable level. But then again, many people didn't believe that online gamblers would make that big a difference in the 2006 mid-term elections. Yet the mid-term elections saw the defeat of many anti-online gambling bill sponsors and co-sponsors, including Jim Leach, the very same 30-year incumbent that Frist was attempting to court.

People have also argued that an online poker player boycott of Coke is a misguided symbolic gesture without a goal. What's the best they'd get, anyway? An apology? A promise never to run the ad again? I don't know. Maybe they'd get a little attention on an issue that they feel strongly about, like overturning the UIGEA. The odds are admittedly long. But when the UIGEA passed, online poker players felt like they were dealt a bad beat and are now politically short-stacked. When you're playing a short stack, sometimes the best move is to push in with any two live cards. Or maybe the skeptics are right, and this week's threads about Coke's ad will fade into the background, making room for the next poker gossip drama bomb.

More Stories

Other Stories

What do you think?