Cookies on the PokerNews Website

We use cookies to support interactive features like login and voting. Also, we allow trusted media partners to analyze site usage. Keep cookies enabled to enjoy the full site experience. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review our cookies information for more details.

Continue using cookies

Will Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Push Federal Online Poker Legislation in 2012?

Online Poker Legislation

For a guy expected to be the key politician involved in eventually getting Internet poker legislation passed in the United States, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has never said much on the topic.

Congressmen Joe Barton and Barney Frank are ambassadors for the cause, having given countless interviews on poker, including with They openly campaign for support.

Reid apparently does his campaigning in private. Earlier this week, he gave a rare public comment to when asked about the DOJ's recent opinion on the Wire Act.

"It'll give us an incentive to get something done," Reid told GamblingCompliance. "We cannot have a series of laws around the country related to [Internet] gaming. I know a lot about gaming. I'm a former chairman of the Nevada [Gaming] Commission, and I think it's very important that we have a national law."

Reid's comments indicate that lawmakers realize 2012 is the time to either move on a federal poker bill or watch some states go on without a federal framework.

"It's very positive that someone like Reid is openly talking about the need to get this done this year," John Pappas, executive director of the Poker Players Alliance, told PokerNews. "We're hoping we can transfer words into law. It's preferable for the players, for the business side of things, to have some clear and consistent standards across 50 states instead of a patchwork of state laws and activities that would be legal in one place but illegal somewhere else."

GamblingCompliance also indicated that Reid confirmed publicly for the first time that he is negotiating with Senator Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) on a federal bill, though he wouldn't get into any of the details.

There's hope in the poker community that Reid will attempt to attach poker legislation to the payroll tax bill next month, though that is probably optimistic. Reid and Kyl, the top Democrat and No. 2 Republican in the Senate, are still negotiating. And Reid hasn't even introduced a bill. Pappas said he didn't think Reid had a final bill yet and offered assurance that the PPA is making certain the player voice is being heard in the formulation of the legislation.

"We're at the table already," Pappas said. "We've met with their staff. We've provided input throughout the process."

With all of Reid's work behind the scenes, he could move quickly on a bill at any time. It wouldn't be shocking to see a bill go from nonexistent to attached to larger legislation without any other progress seen in public. Pappas said the PPA is hoping to see some movement in the next few months or else preparation for the election will make things difficult until the end of the year.

"I think Congress will be paralyzed coming into the summer months," Pappas said. "If something isn't done before that, the lame-duck session will be the next opportunity."

Follow PokerNews on Twitter for up-to-the-minute news.

Like This Article? Please Share, Thank You.



  • flintsword flintsword

    More important is the fact that France took barely six months to put in place a full framework that is bricking gold bars as far as revenue goes. It is not perfect, some fixes have to be added, but it is in place and working really well.

    It is fair to say that this pragmatic & quick french legislation put France ahead of slower countries, stealing pole position from Britain which is best illustrated by the fact that the World Series of Europe installed itself in Cannes for the next seven years.

    The current Poker Prohibition in the U.S. is, at best, ill though out, and at worse totally retarded, forcing some of the best poker players in the world (living in the U.S.) to emigrate OUT of the U.S. to practice a legal profession.

Read 1 comment(s) on this article

What do you think?
Register to leave a comment or

Most Popular This Week