Black Friday Still Lingering on a Gray Sunday
North American Poker Tour
It was just six short weeks ago that the PokerStars Sunday Million celebrated its fifth anniversary with a tournament for the online ages. An astonishing 59,128 players put up the $215 buy-in -- the most players the event has ever seen -- with $1 million and a shiny new Lambo guaranteed to the winner. Meanwhile, players on Full Tilt Poker were embroiled in Double Guarantee week, and Multi-Entry madness upped the stakes at every stakes.
After a tapering-off period, the recent trend of online poker has been a bullish one, but the two largest entities of virtual poker had more far-reaching goals in the real world, too. Within the last month, both PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker announced forward-thinking partnerships with land-based casinos, and the NAPT and Onyx Cup were on the tips of everyone's tongues.
Things have changed a bit since Friday.
PokerStars, Full Tilt Poker, and UB have been indicted by the U.S. Department of Justice. PokerStars, and Full Tilt Poker have closed their doors to players from the U.S. pending the hearings of, and eventual settlements from (or trials of) their chief founders. It's the final culmination of the federally mandated cutting of ties between the three sites and their American players. On Friday morning, the U.S. Department of Justice seized the dot-com domain names of the three poker sites and dished out indictments on 11 officers and merchants. That's where the story essentially ends for now, with the ultimate fate of the sites to be determined only after the legal process is allowed to run its course.
The weekend fallout came quickly as PokerStars almost immediately closed its online client to U.S. players. Full Tilt followed suit a couple of hours later. All three sites have since moved to European domains. Advertising and affiliate banners have vanished on feeder sites, and the land-based casinos have declared their contracts with the online companies null.
Despite the legal disturbances, the sites claim it's "business as usual" outside of the U.S. Still, cutting a few tens of millions of players out of the pool can't be good for your bottom line if you're trying to run a profitable poker site. The continuing aftereffects of Friday's indictments were borne out in plain sight again on Sunday as the online majors showed significantly reduced fields, reduced guarantees, and smaller prize pools across the board. Here's how some of the largest tournament fared between the two largest sites in comparison to the pre-Friday tumble.
| Tournament | Buy-in | Guarantee (Last Week) | Entrants (Last Week) | Prize Pool (Last Week) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PokerStars Sunday Million | $200+$15 | $1 Million ($1.5 Million) | 6,475 (8,273) | $1,295,000 ($1,654,600) |
| PokerStars Sunday Warm-Up | $200+$15 | $500,000 ($750,000) | 3,737 (4,634) | $747,400 ($926,800) |
| PokerStars Sunday 500 | $500+$30 | $250,000 ($500,000) | 623 (962) | $311,500 ($500,000) |
| PokerStars Sunday 2nd Chance | $200+$15 | $125,000 ($250,000) | 749 (1,395) | $149,800 ($279,000) |
| PokerStars 109+R | $100+$9 | $200,000 ($300,000) | 848 (1,152) | $291,700 ($413,500) |
| Full Tilt $1.5 Million Guarantee (FTOPS Event 1) | $200+$16 | $1 Million ($1.5 Million) | 6,953 (9,612) | $1,390,600 ($1,922,400) |
| Full TIlt Sunday Brawl | $240+$16 | $250,000 ($500,000) | 1,703 (2,676) | $408,720 ($535,200) |
| Full Tilt Sunday Mulligan | $200+$16 | $50,000 ($200,000) | 340 (1,001) | $68,000 ($200,200) |
| Full Tilt $200,000 Guarantee (Rebuy) | $150+13 | $125,000 ($200,000) | 308 (529) | $154,800 ($256,050) |
| TOTALS | -- | $3.5 Million ($6.7 Million) | 21,736 (30,204) | $4,426,920 ($6,687,750) |
It's not hard to spot the decrease with such a significant chunk of the player pool absent. Full Tilt and PokerStars saw an average of about a 30% reduction in the numbers for their headline tournaments. On Saturday, Poker Scout reported that traffic on PokerStars was down 18% since the same time last week; UB and AbsolutePoker were down 20%, while Full Tilt was hit even harder. A full 40% of Full Tilt's traffic was driven from the site in the days following the indictment of Tiltware CEO Ray Bitar. Over the weekend, he issued a statement to the players via a pop-up message that expressed his surprise and disappointment at the Department of Justice bringing these charges. He indicated confidence in his exoneration. Ironically, in a 2005 interview Ray Bitar did with PokerNews' former Editor-in-Chief John Caldwell, Bitar was, at the time, positive about the direction of legislation and regulation in the political climate of the time. "Our leaders are concerned with other things," he said. "I have a very positive outlook, but I think it will take time."
With their job now taken away from them, thousands of America's young professional poker players are trying to figure out the next step. Twitter has been abuzz for the past three days with players contemplating everything from retiring on the islands to moving to Canada to jokes about trying to collect unemployment checks. It will be a while before this all shakes out.
In the middle of the Full Tilt Poker release, Bitar was quoted as saying, "Full Tilt Poker remains as committed as ever to preserving the rights of those players to play the game they love online."
Committed or not, the legal hurdles of the regulation of online gambling in the U.S. are daunting, and the time to address them has come. Until then, it will be interesting to see whether the traffic numbers and guarantees will continue to be lower because of the vast share of the market that has been eliminated.
PokerNews is covering these events closely and will continuously be updating with any new information. To stay on the pulse, follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook.
Follow Eric Ramsey on
Recent Articles
- WPT on FSN Five Diamond Part I: Negreanu's Six Bullets & Esfandiari's Final Table Magic
- Seat Open: George Danzer Part Two
- The Sunday Briefing: David “MissOracle” Yan and Steve "betrthanphil" Tripp Win Majors
- Brent Hanks Defeats Gavin Griffin to Win 2013 California State Poker Championship
- 2013 World Poker Tour Championship Day 2: Linster Leads and Shak in Second; Ivey Falls
Most Popular This Week
- Ivey Purportedly Won £7.8 Million Playing Punto Banco by Reading Back of Flawed Cards
- Jamie Gold's 2006 WSOP Main Event Bracelet Up for Auction
- Doyle Brunson to Forgo Tournament Play at the WSOP
- Season 9 EPT Grand Final Super High Roller Day 1: Mercier Mashing; Ivey Busts Twice
- Season 9 EPT Grand Final Super High Roller Day 2: Mercier Leads the Final Table
Comments
What you're describing, ddrew2u, is what the government calls money laundering. Those checks and money orders you describe would have to go through a U.S. bank in order for you to collect on them, which puts them under Justice Dept jurisdiction. What you describe is pretty much what Daniel Tzvetkoff was doing, and it led to his arrest and to him working a deal with the Feds to bring down the big three.
Say Pokerstars had a cash window (like a racetrack) in England where you could travel to to pick up your payouts. Sounds perfectly legal for you to pick up your own payout outside the US. Matter of fact you could pick up a Pokerstars money order in England and cash it in in the English bank it was drawn or check cashing store (if they have such) — and reconvert the cash into a money order to send to yourself in the US. No foreign bank account needed — just you in person. No gambling enterprise would be sending a financial instrument to a US bank — that is all the law prohibits AFAIK.
NEXT STEP: Say a player's personal rep goes and does the same thing for him: same legal payout process. Or, suppose, instead, some smart cookie opens a business in the US where they charge players (plural) a fee to travel to Pokerstars cash payougt window in England — or just as legally open the same business in England to act as player pickup rep — to pick up our winnings in cash for us — not working for Pokerstars; working for us — and then send checks or money orders to us in the US. No gambling enterprise would be sending a financial instrument to a US bank — that is all the law prohibits AFAIK.
NEXT STEP: Say Pokerstars sends cash to US players. When I worked as a truckers helper for a Wall Street Bank in the early 1970s we took tons of mail to the Post Office some of which was registered mail containing cash going to South America. I was told that Registered mail must to be signed for by every person whose hands it passes through all the way to the recipient. Pokerstars could send small to medium payouts by registered mail right now. Really large deliveries could be done by armed insured messenger (you might want to make an appointment to meet the messenger in a bank). No gambling enterprise would be sending a financial instrument to a US bank — that is all the law prohibits AFAIK.
Problem solved? I hope this looks as good in the morning as it does at 4AM. :-)
Following the events of 4/15/2011, poker players, now more than ever, need to come together and demand we be heard. We need strong legislation that protects the rights and efforts of all players, from the casual tournament entrant to the consummate professional earning a living online.
We cannot sit quietly and wait for PokerStars, Full Tilt, and the other off shore companies to fight this fight. We need to speak out for our rights as Americans to participate in these competitions both for fun and for profit. Let us be heard. Comment on our posts. We want to hear from you and keep this conversation alive! Join the cause! YOU ARE THE VOICE!
“Like” the page and pass it on. Help us start a national movement. Stay tuned daily and PLEASE COMMENT under our questions tab and participate in the facebook polls. We want to hear from you. A website will follow soon to aid you in contacting your local and state legislators.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Poker-Players-for-the-Legislation-of-Online-Poker/156110247786798?sk=questions
Read 8 comment(s) on this article