Jonathan Little Attempts a Weird Bluff (in Perhaps the Worst Possible Manner)
Today I want to share an interesting hand from a $3,000 buy-in World Series of Poker event that, well, I probably messed up. The hand features a somewhat strange river spot where I attempted a bluff — one I didn't necessarily set up as well as I could have with my prior actions in the hand.
It was early in the event, with the blinds 50/100 and effective stacks around 9,000. A player in middle position raised to 300 and it folded to me in the big blind where I'd been dealt . I discuss below how with such deep stacks calling is somewhat mandatory in this spot (and three-betting sometimes okay, too, against certain opponents).
I called, and the flop came , giving me a gutshot to a straight, a backdoor flush draw, and two overcards. I checked, my opponent continued for 550 — a large bet relative to the 650 pot. I check-raised to 1,500 and my opponent called, bringing the pot to 3,650.
The turn was the — not too good for me — and we both checked. Then the came on the river, and I bluffed by betting 2,500, trying to represent the flush. But with a flush draw wouldn't I have bet the turn, too?
See what happens in the hand and hear my analysis of both my own and my opponent's decisions on each postflop street.
Even though I won this hand, that doesn't mean I necessarily played it well. Looking back, perhaps betting the turn and jamming the river would have been better. Or checking the turn and overbetting the river. What a weird spot!
Jonathan Little is a professional poker player and author with over $6,500,000 in live tournament earnings. He writes a weekly educational blog and hosts a podcast at JonathanLittlePoker.com. You can follow him on Twitter @JonathanLittle.
Have you ever wanted to write your own articles about poker? Maybe you've got some experiences or opinions about poker that you'd like to share. PokerNews is proud to launch The PN Blog where you can have a platform to make your voice heard. Learn more here.